Legal Opinion

Toothaker v. Lauri, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 6, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

This appeal by the employer, Lauri, Inc., and its insurer presents the question whether an employee receiving payment for total incapacity pursuant to a memorandum of payment is automatically entitled to an inflation adjustment pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 54-B(l) (1989) on the third anniversary of the injury. Because we conclude the answer is no, we vacate the order compelling payment and the forfeiture based thereon.

On June 2, 1989, Leland Toothaker injured his hand while operating a machine press for Lauri, Inc. At the time of the injury Toothaker’s salary was $285.68 per…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stickles v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  2. Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Russell v. RUSSELL'S APPLIANCE SERVICESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Chmielewski v. J.C. ManagementSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Young v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API