Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. King
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HOBSON, Justice.
The petitioner, by certiorari, seeks review of an order of the Florida Industrial Commission holding it, as carrier for the employer, solely liable for the payment of the compensation claim in question. The only issue is whether the petitioner, Security Insurance Company, should be held solely liable or whether it and the respondent, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, should be held jointly and severally liable.
At the initial hearing on this matter, the deputy commissioner refused to receive evidence bearing on the intent of the parties to the Hartford contract of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Otterbein v. Babor & Comeau Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Tri-State Casualty Co. v. SpeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- T. H. Mastin & Co. v. RussellMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Guarantee Insurance v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. RichSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Midstate Hauling Co., Inc. v. Reliable Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Curtis-Hale, Inc. v. GeltzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. NettlesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988