Curtis-Hale, Inc. v. Geltz
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SHIVERS, Judge.
Curtis-Hale, Inc. (Curtis-Hale), its self-insured fund, and its servicing agent appeal the Order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) finding Appellee Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) had properly cancelled its worker’s compensation (WC) policy covering Appellee James Geltz, d/b/a Carpentry Services. The claimant was injured on September 12, 1988; within the course and scope of his employment with Geltz. Geltz was a subcontractor for Curtis-Hale, the general contractor. The issue on appeal is whether competent substantial evidence (CSE) supports the finding that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graves v. Iowa Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Acme Oil v. VasatkaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Masonry v. MILLER CONST.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- PENINSULAR FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bend v. Shamrock ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Sater v. MeloneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994