Legal Opinion
Tri-State Casualty Co. v. Speer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 24, 1941No. 30011PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
The sole question presented is whether the State Industrial Commission was justified in refusing to recognize and give effect to an alleged private agreement for the cancellation of one of two policies of insurance covering the same employer, where the claimant was injured after the effective date of such alleged agreement, but before cancellation notice had been filed with the Industrial Commission as required by section 13377 (e), O. S. 1931, 85 O.S.A. § 64 (e).
From the record it appears that the employer, Pete Parks, doing business as Independent Tank Company, had for some time prior to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Union Indemnity Co. v. SalingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Wilson Drilling Co. v. BeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Farmers Gin Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Gratopp v. Carde Stamping & Tool Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Eurich v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ohran v. National Automobile Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Pine, Adm'r v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- White v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1972
- Preferred Accident Ins. Co. of N. Y. v. Van DusenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Spaulding Osborne v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.