Legal Opinion
Trimen Development Co. v. King County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 18, 1992No. 28580-7-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Trimen Development Company appeals from
a summary judgment dismissing its claims that King County Code (KCC) 19.38 violates former RCW 82.02.020 because it conditions approval of certain subdivisions upon the reservation or dedication of land for parks or upon the payment of a fee in lieu of such reservation or dedication. We affirm.
Plat Approval Procedure
King County Building and Land Development Division (BALD) is the agency charged with reviewing preliminary plat applications. BALD files a report and recommendation with a King County zoning and subdivision examiner (hearing examiner), who…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Deschenes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Board of Regents of the University v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Trimen Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Castle Homes and Development, Inc. v. City of BrierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Wilson v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.