Legal Opinion
Frampton v. H. F. Hartzell
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1960No. Civ. 18504PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment, after jury verdict, in favor of plaintiff for $27,000 for personal injuries.
Questions Presented
Admissibility of evidence (a) Doctor Tempey’s testimony as to opinion of hospital staff members as to cause of insanity; (b) hospital record on same subject; (e) effect of error.
Record
Plaintiff and her son were in their automobile, and while stopped at a traffic light, the ear was struck from the rear by a car driven by defendant Hartzell and owned by defendant Maydwell and Hartzell, Inc. There was a conflict in the evidence as to the force of the impact.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Mullanix v. BasichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Prince v. LoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. HornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- White Missionary Baptist Church v. Trustees of First Baptist Church of WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.