Legal Opinion
Mullanix v. Basich
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1945No. Civ. 7069PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This is an appeal by defendants doing business under the name of Basich Bros., a partnership, from orders of the trial court denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial, and from the judgment entered by the court pursuant to the verdict of the jury.
The plaintiffs Don Mullanix and Julian C. Berry, by their joint complaint, alleged that about 3:30 o’clock a. m. on October, 26, 1942, a truck, owned by the defendant Ford and under hire to defendant Basich Bros,, while being driven by one Zumwalt, who was then in the employ of both Ford and Basich Bros., ran off…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Robinson v. Western States Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Roy v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lahti v. McMenaminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Balkwill v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Kalfus v. FrazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hill v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Causey v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Rupp v. SummerfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.