Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Archuleta
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 30, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0392PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
Six former federal criminal investigators and Gulf War veterans sue the Office of Personnel Management and Katherine Ar-chuleta, 1 OPM’s Director, (collectively OPM) under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), alleging that OPM wrongfully applied a two-year statute of. limitations and denied their administrative claims for unpaid overtime pay. Plaintiffs allege that their overtime claims were timely filed with Government Accountability Office (GAO), 2 because, as war veterans, they are entitled to a five-year statute of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Filmon X, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Caroline R. Homan v. Colonial Penn Life Insurance Company, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Doe v. SteeleDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020