Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Filmon X, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
This ease involves a clash between two important national policies and interests. On the one hand, there is the need to protect and reward copyright owners for creating valuable intellectual property— here, original television programming. On the other hand, it is important to promote competition and ensure broad public access to'diverse television programming. When enacting the Copyright Act of 1976, specifically the compulsory license regime prescribed in 17 U.S.C. § I'll, Congress struck a delicate balance between these two important…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Aereokiller, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Cornell v. Desert Financial Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016