Doe v. Steele
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JANE DOE, Case No. 20-cv-1818-MMA (MSB) 12 Plaintiff, MOTION GRANTING IN PART 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND LEAVE 14 CISSY STEELE, et al., TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY 15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 4] 16 17 18 19 Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”) brings this action against multiple Defendants alleging that 20 she was targeted and groomed for “for the sole purpose of sex trafficking her, in violation 21 of the [Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act].” Doc. No. 12 (“FAC”) ¶ 1. 22 Plaintiff now moves…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop EstateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Jane Roes 1-2 v. SFBSC Management, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Armstrong v. ArchuletaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014