Johnson v. Withers
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
Action for return of a $1,000 cash deposit made on a contract to purchase an interest in mining property, and for the rescission of the contract. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeals from judgment and from order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
The rescission of contract was made and the judgment of the court based upon the ground of a mutual mistake of facts relating to the subject matter. The complaint states two causes of action: The first alleges the purchase by plaintiffs from defendant Withers of a two-thirds interest in a half section of land in Riverside county for $20,000;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kost v. BenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Nounnan v. Sutter County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Lee v. McClellandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Rendell v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Conlan v. RoemerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tetenman v. EpsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Peardon v. MarkleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Sheer v. HoytCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Mosher v. LackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- C. L. Glover Co. v. FarinacciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.