Conlan v. Roemer
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
The parties to this suit entered into a contract of which the following is a copy:
P. H. & J. Conlan, Artesian and Bored Wells, Steam Well Drillers and Contractors eor Water Surely. Pumrs, Piping, &c., Furnished. 216 Market St.
Newark, N. J., January, 13th, 1888. ^
William Boemer, Esq. :
The undersigned agrees and proposes to furnish all the-tools and labor, and drill a six-inch well on your premises, 269 Broome street, on following terms: We to sink best artesian well-pipe to rock, and then drill into same, until a plentiful supply of water…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Masson v. BovetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- McAleer v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Kost v. BenderMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Allen v. HartIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Amer. Container Corp. v. Hanley Trucking Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- McCarty v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Adams v. ReedUtah Supreme Court · 1895
- Krueger v. ArmitageNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
- Brody v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.