Legal Opinion

Kleis v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 18, 1984No. C2-83-2024PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellants brought this action to reform the deed from their grantees to the respondent to reflect appellants’ reservation of an easement across respondent’s land, or, alternatively, to have easement declared. The trial court entered judgment denying reformation and denying an easement, and they appealed. We reverse.

FACTS

For more than fifty years, appellants and their ancestors had used a one-half mile long driveway across the westerly edge of their property for access to their farm. The driveway was the only means of access to the property. In 1975, appellants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Shelard National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Theisen’s Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Theros v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Nolan v. StuebnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Manderfeld v. KrovitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Clark v. Galaxy ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Nunnelee v. SchunaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API