State v. Eichman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
This is a review of that part of the decision of the court of appeals that summarily reversed, pursuant to sec. (Rule) 809.21, Stats. 1985-86, the order of the circuit court for La Crosse county, the Honorable Michael J. Mulroy, Judge, which denied the State's second motion in limine to admit expert testimony by Andrew W. Kane, Ph.D. The first question is whether, as the court of appeals held, the State had the right to appeal, pursuant to sec. 974.05(1)(d)2, Stats., 1985-86. We conclude that the State has the right to appeal pretrial orders that might normally determine the successful…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FriedrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WatsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.