Legal Opinion
Kallenbach v. Dickinson
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1881PublishedCited by 48 opinions
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Owen T. Reeves, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield
This case comes before us by appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Court for the Third District, affirming a judgment of the circuit court of McLean county. The action was assumpsit upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“$424.20.
“Two years after date, for value reóeived, we promise to pay Morris Kallenbach or order four hundred and twenty-four 20-100 dollars, and ten per cent interest.
Gottfried Wenzel, Eliada Dickinson.”
June 3, 1861.
Dickinson alone was served with process, and there was no appearance for the other defendant. Dickinson interposed the defence, by proper…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Keener v. CrullIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Steele v. SouderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Mayberry v. WilloughbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Bank of Montreal v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Waughop v. BartlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- In re Heaton's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- Willoughby v. IrishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Cowhick v. ShingleWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
- Apuzzo v. HoerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.