Legal Opinion

Doyal v. Landes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1889No. 13,383PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Prom the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, C. J. —

The appellant’s complaint is founded on a promissory note and the mortgage securing its payment executed to the appellant by Mary P. Landes and Chris*480topher Landes. The complaint alleges that John and Miles Lane have possession of the note and mortgage, and that although they claim an interest in the note and mortgage they have none. Landes and Landes brought into court the sum they alleged to be due upon the note and mortgage, and prayed the court to determine who was entitled to the money. Lane and Lane asserted title to the note, and averred that it was transferred to them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Fahlor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. VoightIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Fiscus v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Patterson v. ChurchmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Stevens v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Morningstar v. MusserIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API