Legal Opinion

Pedigo v. Grimes

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1887No. 13,848PublishedCited by 37 opinions

From the Orange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee, proceeding under the statute providing for the contest of election, filéd a written statement contesting the election of the appellant to the office of auditor of Monroe county. By appeal the case went to the Monroe Circuit Court, and thence, by change of venue, to the Orange Circuit Court.

The court did not err in denying the appellant’s request for a trial by jury. Our cases holc^ that a jury trial is not demandable in contested election cases, and they are supported by authority. Knox v. Fesler, 17 Ind. 254; Cory v. Segar, 62 Ind. 60; Ewing v. Filly, 43 Pa. St. 384; Hulseman…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Luther v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. People ex rel. Williams v. CicottMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Nave v. FlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Conway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Shugart v. MilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Brunker v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AdamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. ClosserIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API