Legal Opinion

Morningstar v. Musser

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1891No. 15,102PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Owen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J. —

In the bill of exceptions incorporated in the record the report of the stenographer is referred to as containing the evidence, but the report is not made part of the bill, nor ivas there any attempt to make it a part of the bill except by a general reference. That evidence can not be brought into the record in the mode here pursued has been declared in many cases. Wagoner v. Wilson, 108 Ind. 210, and cases cited ; Fahlor v. State, 108 Ind. 387; Stone v. Brown, 116 Ind. 78 ; Flint v. Burnell, 116 Ind. 481; Butler v. Roberts, 118 Ind. 481; Colt v. McConnell, 116 Ind. 249; Doyal v.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bozeman v. CaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Allen v. GavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Chicago & Erie Railway Co. v. CummingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Holland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API