Legal Opinion

Larson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 11, 2009No. Nos. 08-737T, 09-470TPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The two consolidated cases, case nos. 08-737T and 09-470T, involve disputed claims of federal income tax refunds allegedly owed to plaintiffs Duane W. Larson and Pamela A. Larson for tax years 1978, 1979, 1980, 1986, 1988, 1989 and 1991. Defendant, the United States, seeks to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims in their entirety, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or, in the alternative, pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited176 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Palafox Street Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Bowers Investment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Nautilus, Inc. v. Chunchai Yu (In re Chunchai Yu)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2016
  4. Cadrecha v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Widtfeldt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API