Boyce-Canandaigua, Inc. v. Brown
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Respondent appeals and petitioner cross-appeals from an order and judgment that confirmed the report of the Referee in these consolidated tax assessment review proceedings. Supreme Court granted the petitions and determined the assessed values for three separate parcels of real property owned by petitioner at 100 Lakeshore Drive, 158 Lakeshore Drive and 190 Lakeshore Drive in the City of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- FMC Corp. v. UnmackNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. City of Cohoes Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. SrogiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- South Slope Holding Corp. v. ComstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Arsenal Housing Associates v. City Assessor of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Boyce-Canandaigua, Inc. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rosewood Property Co. v. Board of Assessment Review for Town of HamburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- THOMAS, TOM v. BOHEEN DAVIS, CYNTHIA L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.