Legal Opinion

F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Srogi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to petitioner. Memorandum: In these tax review proceedings, respondent Srogi appeals and petitioner F. W. Woolworth Co. cross-appeals from an order and judgment reducing assessments for tax years 1977 through 1980 on improved property at 301 South Salina Street in the City of Syracuse. At issue is the referee’s finding, confirmed by the court, that the full market value of the property for each of the years in question was $602,450. We find no merit to either appeal. The subject property is a three-story metal and masonry structure, with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Merrick Holding Corp. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Plaza Hotel Associates v. Wellington Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. City of Buffalo v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 2641 Concourse Co. v. City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1987
  2. O'Dwyer v. RobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Universal Packaging, Inc. v. Assessor of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Boyce-Canandaigua, Inc. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Davenport v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API