Legal Opinion
South Slope Holding Corp. v. Comstock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order and judgment modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioners appeal and respondents cross-appeal from an order and judgment that, inter alia, determined assessed values for certain properties owned by petitioners for the years 1994, 1995 and 1996. Litigation between the same parties concerning assessments for 1989 and 1990 of other lots resulted in remittitur to this Court (Matter of FMC Corp. v Unmack, 92 NY2d 179). We then remitted the matter to the trial court for, inter alia, findings of fact (Matter of South Slope…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- FMC Corp. v. UnmackNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Erie Lackawanna Railway Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- South Slope Holding Corp. v. Board of Assessment Review of Town of JerusalemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Boyce-Canandaigua, Inc. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Arsenal Housing Associates v. City Assessor of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- 10 Park Square Associates, Inc. v. TravelersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- THOMAS, TOM v. BOHEEN DAVIS, CYNTHIA L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.