Boyce-Canandaigua, Inc. v. Brown

—Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, memorandum decision filed December 21, 2001 (289 AD2d 971, 971) is amended by deleting the last sentence of the third paragraph and substituting in its place the following paragraph: “We have considered petitioner’s contention that the Referee improperly included a 1.25 acre wetland buffer in his valuation of that parcel. Petitioner’s appraiser conceded on cross-examination that he ascribed no value to the wetland buffer, revealing that he was unfamiliar with the permit process of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation…