Legal Opinion

Brager-Larsen v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 31, 1947No. C. D. 1042PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

Silver or black fox furs or skins are subject to duty under paragraph 1519 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The trade agreement with Canada (T. D. 49752), effective January 1,1939, fixed this rate of duty at 37% per centum ad valorem.

This suit involves fox furs or skins classified as silver fox by the collector at the port of New York.

These furs, imported from Norway in December 1939, are claimed by plaintiff to be free of duty under the provision of paragraph 1681 for fúrs and fur skins, not specially provided for, undressed. That they are undressed is conceded by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  5. Rossman v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sam Forwand Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. International Customs Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API