Legal Opinion

Great Western Mercantile Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 28, 1950No. C. D. 1275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The two suits against tbe United States listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, present for our determination the question of the proper classification of certain *127imported merobandise upon which, duty was levied at the rate of 65 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1211 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the merchandise having been classified as manufactures in chief value of silk, not specially provided for. Plaintiffs made several claims in their original protests, but the only claim relied upon, made by proper amendment, is that “The merchandise is dutiable at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Robertson v. SalomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Marvel v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. 200 Chests of TeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. International Customs Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Timber Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. Pacific Overseas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API