Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 14, 1945No. C. D. 930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

These are suits against the United States arising at the port of New York by protest against the collector’s classification of the merchandise as oleo stearin and assessing duty thereon at 1 cent per pound. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is tallow.

Paragraph 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides:

Par. 701. * * * tallow, one-half of 1 cent per pound; oleo oil and oleo stearin, 1 cent per pound; * ■ * * .

In the consular invoices and the bills of lading in these cases the merchandise is described as “extra premier jus.” Other papers contain the following descriptions:

Depart…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Rockhill & VietorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Lee v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Customs Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API