Legal Opinion
Isbrandtsen Co. v. S. S. Kokoh Maru
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 24, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, District Judge.
Sumitomo Shoji New York, Inc. moves to intervene in this libel. Motion denied.
Presently pending in the New York Supreme Court, New York County, is an action wherein Sumitomo Shoji New York, Inc. (Sumitomo), plaintiff, against Isbrandtsen Company, Inc., defendant, (movant and libelant respectively before us) seeks to recover the purchase price of steel wire under contracts of sale. The libel with which we are concerned was brought against the ocean carrier, respondent, to recover for damage to the identical goods while in transit.
We take into consideration the following:
1…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Cresta Blanca Wine Co. v. Eastern Wine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Commonwealth Edison Company v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company, and Stateof Illinois, Appellant-Applicant for InterventionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Butler v. DentonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Baltimore & O. R. v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Burney v. North American Rockwell CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
- Antonio A. Diaz v. The Southern Drilling Corp., Also Known as South-Eastern Drilling Inc., Etal., and Trefina, A.G., Intervenor-Appellant. Great American Investment Company, Limited, Etc. v. W. P. Clements, Jr., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Pierson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Warheit v. OstenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973