Legal Opinion

Baltimore & O. R. v. Thompson

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided March 31, 1948No. 4999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULEN, District Judge.

Application of Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Company to intervene, presented under Rule 24, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, raises the question of intervention of right and permissive intervention. As to intervention of right, in-tervenor’s brief presents as a basis therefor that provision of the Rule reading as follows: “(2) when the representation of the applicant’s interest by existing parties is or may be inadequate and the applicant is or may be bound by a judgment in the action; * * * ”, During oral argument counsel for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Nashua and Lowell Railroad v. Boston and Lowell RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Boston & M. R. R. v. HurdCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
  5. Johnson v. Riverland Levee Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maryland v. RolenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1954
  2. Isbrandtsen Co. v. S. S. Kokoh MaruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Union Nat. Bank of Youngstown v. Superior Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Curtis v. American Book Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  5. American Bowling Supply Co. v. Al Martin, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API