Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Edison Company v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company, and Stateof Illinois, Appellant-Applicant for Intervention

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 1, 1963No. 13904PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.

Among the plaintiffs in eighteen related antitrust suits filed below charging defendants, electrical equipment manufacturers, with conspiracy to fix prices, allocate markets and submit collusive bids, are four public utilities operating in the State of Illinois, namely, Commonwealth Edison Company, Central Illinois Electric and Gas Co., Central Illinois Light Company and Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company. (These four Illinois public utilities will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiffs). Plaintiffs serve some 2,500,000 consumers with electric light and power.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. William E. Nuesse, Commissioner of Banks, State of Wisconsin v. William Camp, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. Lucille Jeffrey, on Their Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Southwestern BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Hobson v. HansenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
  5. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API