Legal Opinion
Maze v. Gordon
California Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1892No. 14915PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
— Plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment and an order refusing a new trial. Action to recover broker’s commission.
The broker was employed under the following contract: —
“ Know all men by these presents, that I have this day placed in charge and possession of W. C. Maze, as broker, for sale for the term of twelve (12) months from date hereof, the following described property, to wit, secs. 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13,14, and 15 of township 11 south, range 19 east, containing 5,720 acres, or any number of acres agreed on of above-numbered sections, commencing on the north side, at $7 per…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Kimmell v. SkellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Russell v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Blank v. BordenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Baumgartner v. MeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Snook v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.