Legal Opinion
Moskow v. Fine
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 30, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract. The declaration contained three counts, but the claim alleged in count 2 has been waived. The other counts are for the same cause of action, one being to recover under a lease of an apartment $85 as rent for one month due on May 1, 1933, and the other to recover the same sum for use and occupation of the apartment for the same period. The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts in substance as follows: The defendant signed the lease upon which count 1 is based and took possession of. the apartment. He occupied it until June 14, 1933, when he moved out.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Franklin v. North Weymouth Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- McCarthy v. William H. Wood Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Woodman v. HaynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Central Mills Co. v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Weiner v. Pictorial Paper Package Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Wunsch v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Rainault v. EvartsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Cheetham v. Crescent Gardens Operating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- David J. Saltz v. Lucky Seven Moto-Stores, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.