Legal Opinion

Wunsch v. Donnelly

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 1, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

The defendant appealed from the order of the Appellate Division dismissing the report of the trial judge, who found for the plaintiff, in an action of contract to recover rent alleged to be due in accordance with a written lease dated May 22, 1930. No question of pleading is involved and the facts are not in dispute.

The material portions of the lease are as follows: “This indenture, made this 22nd day of May a.d. 1930 between Myer Wunsch of Dorchester, Massachusetts, hereinafter called the lessor of the first part, and John Donnelly & Sons, hereinafter called the advertiser or lessees of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Freeland v. RitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Malden Knitting Mills v. United States Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Alfano v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Codman v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Murray v. CherringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carolina Helicopter Corp. v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Indus. MacHinery, Inc. v. Creative DisplaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Michael Chevrolet, Inc. v. Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Burns v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Evans v. SackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API