Legal Opinion

Shattuck v. American Cement Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1903No. Appeal, No. 243PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal, No. 243, Jan. T., 1902, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Pbila. Co., Deo. T., 1899, No. 216, on case stated in case of Frank R. Shattuck v. American Cement Company. Case stated to determine the validity of transfer of stock.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 243, Jan. T., 1902, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Pbila. Co., Deo. T., 1899, No. 216, on case stated in case of Frank R. Shattuck v. American Cement Company. Case stated to determine the validity of transfer of stock. The case stated was as follows : On September 7, 1899, plaintiff purchased from Jamison Brothers & Company 1,500 shares of the stock of the American Cement Company, being certificates Nos. 488 to 491, inclusive, and Nos. 503 to 508, inclusive, making in all fifteen certificates for 100 shares each, each certificate being in form as follows: “ TEMPORARY…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Bbown,

It seems to be useless for us to call the attention of some of the lower courts to the propriety of an opinion containing the *205reasons for entering a judgment where reasons manifestly ought to be given. In the present case reasons for the judgment entered certainly ought to have been given, and it is to be regretted that the learned court withheld them.

When the appellee purchased the stock from Jamison Brothers & Company, they handed to him proper certificates, with an assignment and power of attorney on the back of each, signed by them in blank. They parted with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Moore v. . Metropolitan National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
  4. Bridgeport Bank v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  5. Wood v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fowles v. National Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Jones v. CostlowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Colonial Trust Co. v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Froio v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. King v. Mellon National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API