Legal Opinion

Jones v. Costlow

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1944No. Appeal, 106PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

It is perhaps natural that plaintiff should feel aggrieved by the loss of his stock in a prosperous corporation through its sale by the pledgees to whom he had assigned it as collateral, but that he is justified in attributing his misfortune to any improper conduct on the part of the directors of the corporation is an entirely different proposition and one that is not supported by the evidence in this case.

Motor Sales Company of Johnstown was incorporated in 1919 and since then has carried on an automobile sales agency and general garage business. At the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stimson v. StimsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Shattuck v. American Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Lyle v. ShaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Colonial Trust Co. v. Central Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Jones v. Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Kroese v. General Steel Castings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Thomas P. Knapp v. Bankers Securities Corporation Appeal of Bankers Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. Jones v. CostlowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Cole Real Estate Corp. v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API