Legal Opinion

McMahon v. Pearlman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 5, 1922PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenney, J.

This is a suit in equity in which Drew C. Canfield McMahon seeks to reach and apply under G. L. c. 175, §§ 112,113, money provided for in a contract of insurance between the defendants Hannah Pearlman and the Great Eastern Casualty Company. The contract was for the term of one year from June 2, 1919, and by it the company agreed to indemnify Pearl-man against loss from the liability imposed by law upon her on account of bodily injuries and resultant death accidentally suffered as a result of the ownership, maintenance, or use of her-automobile. The policy expressly exempted the insurer from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Holden v. McGillicuddyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Todd v. Traders & Mechanics InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McDonough v. VozzelaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Odden v. Union Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Sontag v. GalerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Commerce Insurance v. KochMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  5. Klefbeck v. DousMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API