Legal Opinion

Macomb v. Wilkinson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to "YYayne. (Reilly, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

This suit involves the right of the defendant to show that a part of the consideration of a certain note given by him to R. P. Toms in his life-time consisted of illegal attorney’s fees charged in the foreclosure of certain mortgages in the hands of Mr. Toms for foreclosure, and to have the amount of such illegal attorney’s fees deducted from said note.

In January, 1889, John N. Macomb brought suit in the Wayne circuit against the defendant upon a promissory note, a copy of which appears in the record as follows:

“ $1,500. Detroit, November 3, 1876.
“ Sixty days after date, I promise to pay to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. PiersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Millard v. TruaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stotts v. StottsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In re Bresler's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Brown v. SmedleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. First National Bank v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Fort Wayne Mortgage Co. v. CarletosMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API