Stotts v. Stotts
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Van Zile, J. Bill by George E. Stotts and another against Elizabeth Stotts and another to quiet title to land and for an accounting. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSteers, J.
Defendants Elizabeth Stotts and Alberta Stotts Auringer are daughters of plaintiff George E. Stotts. He and plaintiff Sarah Stotts, his second wife and their stepmother, filed this bill to recover the title to and possession of a house and lot in the city of Detroit known as 1287 Wabash avenue, appraised by real estate men at approximately $2,300 or $2,400. In-, 1913 and 1914, it was valued for taxation at $1,220 as shown by the assessment records for those years. The legal description of the premises is:
“Lot No. six hundred and twenty-two (622) situated on the west side of Wabash avenue…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strohauer v. VoltzMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Ruch v. RuchMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Garton v. Union City National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Velten v. CarmackOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Church v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fleischhauer v. BILSTAD, GRAY ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re Rudell EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Schaffner v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Edoff v. HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Krueger v. GrothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.