Legal Opinion

Millard v. Truax

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Ingbam. Bill to set aside foreclosure. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCoolet, J.

The bill in this case is filed to set aside a statutory foreclosure and permit the complainants to redeem.

■Complainants are grantees of one Cummings who on July 12, 1876, mortgaged the land in controversy to Peter Lowe to secure the payment of the sum of two hundred dollars with ten per centum interest in one year from that date. The bill alleges that Lowe assigned to defendant and defendant made an assignment without consideration to one Smith, and procured Smith in defendant’s interest to institute proceedings in foreclosure in July, 1877, after one year’s interest had been paid; that Clark…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bullock v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Myer v. HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Parks v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Macomb v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Johnson v. DayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Huyck v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Millard v. TruaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API