Burlington City Board of Education v. United States Mineral Products Co.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RUSSELL A. ELIASON, United States Magistrate.
Defendant moves for a protective order restricting the use of the video depositions which plaintiff has taken of defendant’s expert witnesses. Rule 26(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. A previous Order permitted video depositions of defendant’s corporate officers and expert witnesses. It generally set out conditions concerning the recording of the depositions but not with respect to their use before, at, or after trial. Defendant’s expert, Robert N. Sawyer, M.D., was deposed in January of this year and, according to defendant, was video taped over ns…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General William C. Westmoreland, Ambassador Richard Helms v. Cbs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Johnson Foils, Inc. v. Huyck Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1973
- United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1981
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
- Westmoreland v. CBS, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parkway Gallery Furniture, Inc. v. Kittinger/Pennsylvania House Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
- Pia v. Supernova Media, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2011
- DiCesare v. MakinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- In re: James M. Foor and Krystina Foor v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2026