Pia v. Supernova Media, Inc.
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID NUFFER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintifficounterclaim defendant/cross-claim defendant Joseph G. Pia and third-party defendant/cross-claim defendant Pia Anderson Dorius Reynard & Moss, LLC (“PADRM”) have filed a motion for a protective order to prohibit the disclosure of deposition transcripts and video-and audiotapes of any depositions taken in this case.1 Because the court finds that Pia and PADRM have failed to establish good cause for entry of a protective order, the motion will be denied.
This case revolves around the production of a feature film…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc. v. Uptown ProductionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Flaherty v. SeroussiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- Loussier v. Universal Music Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Burlington City Board of Education v. United States Mineral Products Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dougherty, J., Aplt. v. Heller, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Dougherty, J., Aplt. v. Heller, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- HCP Systems, LLC and Health Services, LLC - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Jason Sanchez v. Eddy County Board of Commissioners, et al.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
- Vox Marketing Group v. Prodigy PromosDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020