Legal Opinion

Pia v. Supernova Media, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided July 29, 2011No. 2:09-CV-840 CWPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID NUFFER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintifficounterclaim defendant/cross-claim defendant Joseph G. Pia and third-party defendant/cross-claim defendant Pia Anderson Dorius Reynard & Moss, LLC (“PADRM”) have filed a motion for a protective order to prohibit the disclosure of deposition transcripts and video-and audiotapes of any depositions taken in this case.1 Because the court finds that Pia and PADRM have failed to establish good cause for entry of a protective order, the motion will be denied.

This case revolves around the production of a feature film…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc. v. Uptown ProductionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. Flaherty v. SeroussiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
  4. Loussier v. Universal Music Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  5. Burlington City Board of Education v. United States Mineral Products Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dougherty, J., Aplt. v. Heller, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Dougherty, J., Aplt. v. Heller, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. HCP Systems, LLC and Health Services, LLC - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
  4. Jason Sanchez v. Eddy County Board of Commissioners, et al.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
  5. Vox Marketing Group v. Prodigy PromosDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API