Huntingdon, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Huntingdon, Ine. and Hyland Homes, Die. appeal an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which directed it to pay a .sum in the amount of $138,624.00 to the Newtown Artesian Water Company (Newtown) or suffer termination of water service to Huntingdon’s residential development.
Huntingdon, Inc. (Huntingdon) is the developer of a seventy-nine acre residential development in Bucks County known as Sturibridge.1 Prior to the start of construction on the site, Huntingdon approached Newtown to secure water service for the proposed development. Newtown, in a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ridley Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Colonial Products Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- McCormick v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Burleson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Fairview Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Lynch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Society Hill Carriage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.