Legal Opinion
Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 21, 2006No. 19 MAP 2005Published
1Opinion of the Court
910 A.2d 38 (2006)
Irwin A. POPOWSKY, Consumer Advocate, Appellant,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellee,
Pennsylvania-American Water Company, Intervenor.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued May 16, 2005.
Decided November 21, 2006.
Joel Howard Cheskis, Esq., Dianne Elaine Dusman, Esq., Camp Hill, for Irwin A. Popowsky.
Charles M. Means, Esq., Mandi Lea Scott, Esq., Pittsburgh, for Collier Township.
Bohdan R. Pankiw, Esq., Wayne Thomas Scott, Esq., Robert James Longwell, Esq., Jaime Marie McClintock, Esq., Harrisburg, for Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
Anthony C. DeCusatis,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Housing Authority of Chester v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Slawek v. BD. OF MED. ED. & LICENSURESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.