Legal Opinion
Society Hill Carriage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 23, 1990No. 1942 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALLADINO, Judge.
Society Hill Carriage Company and Robert F. Dougherty, d/b/a Out Back Farm (Petitioners) appeal from orders of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which cancelled the Petitioners’ certificates of public convenience. We affirm.
Petitioners operate businesses that were authorized by the PUC to transport persons, by horse-drawn vehicle, in the city and county of Philadelphia. The PUC issued orders to show cause why the Petitioners’ certificates of public convenience should not be revoked to conform to the PUC’s policy statement at 52 Pa.Code § 41.20. This section…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dairymen's Co-Operative Sales Assn. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Dairymen's Co-Operative Sales Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Huntingdon, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Protective Motor Service Co. v. P.U.C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waltman v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pettineo v. City of Philadelphia Law Department-Claims DivisionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Pettineo v. City of Philadelphia Law Department-Claims DivisionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Waltman v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992