Legal Opinion

Burleson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1982No. Appeal, No. 62 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

J udge MacPhail,

Gary and Doris Burleson (Petitioners) have appealed to this Court from a decision of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) dismissing Petitioners’ complaint that West Penn Power Co. (West Penn) had overcharged for electric service rendered between January, 1978 to June, 1979.1

The evidence presented at the hearing was, in general, uneontradieted. Petitioners live in a mobile home located in Smitlifield. Petitioners first moved into the *284home in August of 1976. Petitioners testified that since January of 1978 until June of 1979 they experienced problems with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Monongahela Connecting Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. v. FeinsteinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burleson v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Huntingdon, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Philboro Coach Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Crown American Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API