Legal Opinion

Parts Manufacturing Associates, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 17, 1974No. C.D. 4552; Court Nos. 70/53017, 70/53022, and 70/53023PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain aircraft passenger seats. The seats were manufactured in England and entered at the port of Charleston, South Carolina in 1969. At the trial, on plaintiff’s motion, and without objection, Court Nos. 70/53017, 70/ 53022, and 70/53023, were consolidated.

The seats weraclassified by the customs .officials under item 727.55 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as “[fjurniture, and parts thereof, not specially provided for: * *. * [o]ther.” Duty was consequently…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Herbert G. Schwarz, Dba Ski Imports v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Kobata v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Haan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Porter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. United States v. De Laval Separator Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  3. United States v. PorterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  4. De Laval Separator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API