Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 6, 2009No. 2764, September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

The problem is a simple one of proper conceptualization. At a surface level, the tactical issue in the case is that of whether Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), applies to the investigative event on which the appellant focuses. At the strategic level, the issue is that of whether the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination applies to that investigative event. If, for any reason, that strategic protection should not apply, then any tactical minutiae generated by Miranda v. Arizona would be beside the point. The subordination of the…

2Cases cited98 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. JamesIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. LuckettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Powell v. Md. Dep't of HealthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Pryor v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API