State v. James
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Justice.
This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of Dustin James’ motion to suppress. James asks this Court to decide whether an officer’s threat to arrest all occupants of an automobile if one occupant did not incriminate himself or herself triggered a duty to provide Miranda warnings. Based upon the limited record before this Court, we conclude that James has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that he was in custody for purposes of Miranda. We therefore affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Dustin James (James) was a passenger in a car stopped in the early…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. Victor Garcia-RodriguezIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Matthew Elliot CohaganIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. SmalleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. AndersenIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Godwin, Sr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.