Legal Opinion

State v. Luckett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 14, 2010No. 122 September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBERA, Judge.

We decide in this case whether a confession that Respondent Terris Terrell Luckett gave to the police complied with the dictates of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The Circuit Court for Prince George’s County ruled that the police did not comply with the requirement of Miranda that a suspect be properly advised of the right to counsel that attends custodial interrogation. The Circuit Court granted Respondent’s motion to suppress the statement he gave to the police following what the court ruled was a constitutionally defective advisement.

T…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API