Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 17, 2010No. 102, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

In this ease we are asked to determine whether the Petitioner’s (“Thomas Smith” or “Smith”) statement to police that the “[drugs are] all mine,” made during the execution of a search warrant at Smith’s residence, was a product of police interrogation. For purposes of this opinion, we shall assume, without deciding, that Smith was in custody for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), at the time he made the statement to the police. 1 Our focus is on the question of whether the lead investigator’s act of showing Smith the contraband that the officers…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Arizona v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Powell v. Md. Dep't of HealthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Pryor v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Cox v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API