Legal Opinion

Powell v. Md. Dep't of Health

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 28, 2017No. 77, Sept. Term, 2016PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

**527A criminal prosecution may not proceed against a defendant who is not competent to stand trial. For that reason, a defendant may not be continued in pretrial detention unless the government is taking steps to provide treatment to restore the defendant to competence or to have the defendant civilly committed. Maryland law provides for a trial court to determine whether a defendant is competent, is dangerous to self or others, and, if incompetent, has the potential to be restored to competence. If these criteria are met, the trial court may commit the defendant to a mental health facility…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pizza di Joey v. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. J.K. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2020
  3. Simms v. Dept. of HealthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Thornton Mellon v. Frederick Cnty. SheriffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API